<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 58 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27585</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the penalty notice, rejected claims of limitation, and affirmed the sanction for the levy of penalty for deemed income. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the applicability of the Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) and rehear the appeal. The decision was made without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 58 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27585</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the penalty notice, rejected claims of limitation, and affirmed the sanction for the levy of penalty for deemed income. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the applicability of the Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) and rehear the appeal. The decision was made without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>