<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1549 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299862</link>
    <description>Cancellation of bail is justified only where the bail order suffers from serious infirmity, such as ignoring relevant material, relying on irrelevant material, or causing miscarriage of justice. The Court noted that the Sessions Court had considered the material before granting bail, the investigation was complete, and there was no basis to treat the bail order as perverse. Allegations that the accused threatened witnesses or tampered with evidence after release were found vague and unsupported by particulars. On that basis, the High Court&#039;s cancellation of bail was held unjustified and the cancellation order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1549 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299862</link>
      <description>Cancellation of bail is justified only where the bail order suffers from serious infirmity, such as ignoring relevant material, relying on irrelevant material, or causing miscarriage of justice. The Court noted that the Sessions Court had considered the material before granting bail, the investigation was complete, and there was no basis to treat the bail order as perverse. Allegations that the accused threatened witnesses or tampered with evidence after release were found vague and unsupported by particulars. On that basis, the High Court&#039;s cancellation of bail was held unjustified and the cancellation order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>