<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1300 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416534</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice issued by the Additional Commissioner of Central Taxes and Customs, Hyderabad, stating that the officer was a &#039;proper officer&#039; authorized under the CGST Act. The petitioner was given three weeks to respond to the notice, with the Court emphasizing that its decision was solely on the &#039;proper officer&#039; issue and did not address the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1300 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416534</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice issued by the Additional Commissioner of Central Taxes and Customs, Hyderabad, stating that the officer was a &#039;proper officer&#039; authorized under the CGST Act. The petitioner was given three weeks to respond to the notice, with the Court emphasizing that its decision was solely on the &#039;proper officer&#039; issue and did not address the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>