<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416529</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances for delayed deposits to both the provident fund and the Employees State Insurance scheme. The ITAT emphasized the significance of timely deposits and adherence to due dates in accordance with relevant laws and judicial interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 08:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416529</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances for delayed deposits to both the provident fund and the Employees State Insurance scheme. The ITAT emphasized the significance of timely deposits and adherence to due dates in accordance with relevant laws and judicial interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>