<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1291 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416525</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remitting the issues of the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 and the disallowance of Rs. 12,09,891 back to the AO for further examination. The tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 27,38,798 for repair expenditures, agreeing with the capitalization of road construction costs due to enduring benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 08:54:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1291 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416525</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remitting the issues of the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 and the disallowance of Rs. 12,09,891 back to the AO for further examination. The tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 27,38,798 for repair expenditures, agreeing with the capitalization of road construction costs due to enduring benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>