<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1279 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416513</link>
    <description>Articles of Association required General Meeting approval before the Board could enrol additional members. Enrolment undertaken without recorded General Meeting authorisation was treated as invalid, requiring removal of the affected members from the register and rectification of company records. The Board also lacked authority under the Articles to grant member loans without applications, security or agreements. The appellant&#039;s prior removal from membership had been treated as void, preserving standing to challenge the enrolments. A limitation objection raised outside the original pleadings was not considered without an opportunity for response.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 08:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1279 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416513</link>
      <description>Articles of Association required General Meeting approval before the Board could enrol additional members. Enrolment undertaken without recorded General Meeting authorisation was treated as invalid, requiring removal of the affected members from the register and rectification of company records. The Board also lacked authority under the Articles to grant member loans without applications, security or agreements. The appellant&#039;s prior removal from membership had been treated as void, preserving standing to challenge the enrolments. A limitation objection raised outside the original pleadings was not considered without an opportunity for response.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>