<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1269 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant was instructed to fulfill the deposit obligation before the appeal could be heard on its merits, providing an opportunity to rectify the deficiency and proceed with substantive adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 08:52:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1269 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant was instructed to fulfill the deposit obligation before the appeal could be heard on its merits, providing an opportunity to rectify the deficiency and proceed with substantive adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>