<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 889 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299815</link>
    <description>Bail granted under Section 167(2) CrPC is treated as bail under Chapter XXXIII, and Section 439(2) empowers the High Court or Court of Session to direct that a person released on bail be arrested and committed to custody. The power to cancel such bail is distinct from cancellation based on subsequent misconduct or new facts. Where the default-bail order is shown to be illegal or erroneous, the superior court may set it aside and cancel the bail under Section 439(2). The text states that cancellation of the bail granted under Section 167(2) was legally permissible and that restoration of the Sessions Court&#039;s order was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:49:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 889 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299815</link>
      <description>Bail granted under Section 167(2) CrPC is treated as bail under Chapter XXXIII, and Section 439(2) empowers the High Court or Court of Session to direct that a person released on bail be arrested and committed to custody. The power to cancel such bail is distinct from cancellation based on subsequent misconduct or new facts. Where the default-bail order is shown to be illegal or erroneous, the superior court may set it aside and cancel the bail under Section 439(2). The text states that cancellation of the bail granted under Section 167(2) was legally permissible and that restoration of the Sessions Court&#039;s order was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>