<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27569</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled that casual workers should be considered when determining if an industrial undertaking has employed ten or more workers for relief under section 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the term &quot;worker&quot; in the provision encompasses all types of workers, including casual, permanent, or temporary, as long as the threshold of ten workers is met. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, granting relief to the assessee and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that casual workers should not be counted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27569</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled that casual workers should be considered when determining if an industrial undertaking has employed ten or more workers for relief under section 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the term &quot;worker&quot; in the provision encompasses all types of workers, including casual, permanent, or temporary, as long as the threshold of ten workers is met. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, granting relief to the assessee and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that casual workers should not be counted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>