https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416496 The court held in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the assessing officer must grant a stay on demand recovery until the disposal of the first appeal, with only a 20% pre-deposit required. The respondents were directed to refund the excess amount adjusted in violation of the 20% limit for the disputed tax demands of the Assessment Year 2016-17. The court emphasized compliance with office memorandums and legal principles, ultimately granting the petitioner's request for a refund and disposing of the writ petition and application. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Dec 2021 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416496 The court held in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the assessing officer must grant a stay on demand recovery until the disposal of the first appeal, with only a 20% pre-deposit required. The respondents were directed to refund the excess amount adjusted in violation of the 20% limit for the disputed tax demands of the Assessment Year 2016-17. The court emphasized compliance with office memorandums and legal principles, ultimately granting the petitioner's request for a refund and disposing of the writ petition and application. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416496