<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1247 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A for both assessment years, citing that interest income from the partnership firm should be treated as business income and not subjected to disallowance. However, the additions under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits were upheld as the assessee failed to prove the transactions&#039; creditworthiness and genuineness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:32:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1247 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A for both assessment years, citing that interest income from the partnership firm should be treated as business income and not subjected to disallowance. However, the additions under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits were upheld as the assessee failed to prove the transactions&#039; creditworthiness and genuineness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>