https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299800 A second criminal revision is barred under section 397(3) CrPC unless the impugned order shows illegality, perversity, unreasonableness, or abuse of process. In a prosecution under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a signed and delivered cheque left blank as to payee and amount is treated as an inchoate instrument under section 20, giving the holder prima facie authority to complete it. Where the drawer admits the signature, that circumstance alone does not justify sending the cheque for handwriting examination. The challenge to the order therefore failed, and the lower proceedings were to be concluded expeditiously. en-us Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:30:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299800 A second criminal revision is barred under section 397(3) CrPC unless the impugned order shows illegality, perversity, unreasonableness, or abuse of process. In a prosecution under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a signed and delivered cheque left blank as to payee and amount is treated as an inchoate instrument under section 20, giving the holder prima facie authority to complete it. Where the drawer admits the signature, that circumstance alone does not justify sending the cheque for handwriting examination. The challenge to the order therefore failed, and the lower proceedings were to be concluded expeditiously. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299800