<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 1009 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of interest expenditure against interest earned on capital investment in a partnership firm for the Assessment Year 2006-07. The revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the allowance of interest expenditure disallowed under sec. 14A r.w.r 8D of IT Rules was dismissed. The Tribunal found a direct and sole relation between the interest expenditure and income earned, concluding that no disallowance was warranted under sec. 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 1009 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of interest expenditure against interest earned on capital investment in a partnership firm for the Assessment Year 2006-07. The revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the allowance of interest expenditure disallowed under sec. 14A r.w.r 8D of IT Rules was dismissed. The Tribunal found a direct and sole relation between the interest expenditure and income earned, concluding that no disallowance was warranted under sec. 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>