<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27560</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount of Rs. 82,264 should not be included in the net wealth for the assessment years 1968-69 to 1971-72. The court held that until the final assessment order was made, the assessee had no right or interest in the excess amount deposited as advance tax. Therefore, the refund amount could not be considered part of the assessee&#039;s wealth on the relevant valuation dates. The decision favored the assessee against the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27560</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount of Rs. 82,264 should not be included in the net wealth for the assessment years 1968-69 to 1971-72. The court held that until the final assessment order was made, the assessee had no right or interest in the excess amount deposited as advance tax. Therefore, the refund amount could not be considered part of the assessee&#039;s wealth on the relevant valuation dates. The decision favored the assessee against the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>