<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 1012 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299788</link>
    <description>The court quashed the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the company and its directors. The court held that since the cheque amount exceeded the debt owed at the time of presentation, Section 138 was not applicable. Consequently, the complaint was quashed, and the petitioners were granted relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 14:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 1012 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299788</link>
      <description>The court quashed the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the company and its directors. The court held that since the cheque amount exceeded the debt owed at the time of presentation, Section 138 was not applicable. Consequently, the complaint was quashed, and the petitioners were granted relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>