<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27559</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Department, stating that the amount received by the assessee from the Government of Andhra Pradesh was considered income and should be included in the total assessable income for the relevant year. The court determined that the refund was not a voluntary contribution but a revenue receipt closely connected to the business activities of the assessee. Additionally, the court held that the refunded amount fell within the scope of section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, deeming it as profits and gains of business. The court also found that a specific circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes did not apply to the State scheme in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27559</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Department, stating that the amount received by the assessee from the Government of Andhra Pradesh was considered income and should be included in the total assessable income for the relevant year. The court determined that the refund was not a voluntary contribution but a revenue receipt closely connected to the business activities of the assessee. Additionally, the court held that the refunded amount fell within the scope of section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, deeming it as profits and gains of business. The court also found that a specific circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes did not apply to the State scheme in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>