<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 28 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27556</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the legal heir, holding that penalty proceedings under s. 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act could not be initiated against the legal heirs. The Court emphasized the limited liability of legal representatives in penalty matters, stating that the legal representative could not be penalized for a default committed by the deceased assessee. The judgment highlighted the specific provisions of the Act and aimed to protect legal heirs from penalties arising from the deceased&#039;s defaults.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 28 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27556</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the legal heir, holding that penalty proceedings under s. 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act could not be initiated against the legal heirs. The Court emphasized the limited liability of legal representatives in penalty matters, stating that the legal representative could not be penalized for a default committed by the deceased assessee. The judgment highlighted the specific provisions of the Act and aimed to protect legal heirs from penalties arising from the deceased&#039;s defaults.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>