https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299783 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not quashed because, read with the supporting documents, it disclosed the ingredients of the offence, and the trial had already reached defence evidence after completion of prosecution evidence and examination under Section 313 CrPC. The Court also rejected the request to send the cheque for handwriting expert examination, distinguishing completion of a blank cheque by the payee under Section 20 from material alteration under Section 87. At the defence stage, the accused could not require the Court to collect evidence for him absent a legally sustainable case of material alteration. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Dec 2021 10:44:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299783 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not quashed because, read with the supporting documents, it disclosed the ingredients of the offence, and the trial had already reached defence evidence after completion of prosecution evidence and examination under Section 313 CrPC. The Court also rejected the request to send the cheque for handwriting expert examination, distinguishing completion of a blank cheque by the payee under Section 20 from material alteration under Section 87. At the defence stage, the accused could not require the Court to collect evidence for him absent a legally sustainable case of material alteration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299783