<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1221 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416455</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the registration cancellation was considered for revocation by the Additional Commissioner. The appellant&#039;s compliance with filing returns and paying dues, including the interest liability, led to the decision in favor of revocation. The judgment highlighted the significance of meeting statutory requirements for revocation of registration cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1221 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416455</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the registration cancellation was considered for revocation by the Additional Commissioner. The appellant&#039;s compliance with filing returns and paying dues, including the interest liability, led to the decision in favor of revocation. The judgment highlighted the significance of meeting statutory requirements for revocation of registration cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>