<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1213 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416447</link>
    <description>Lease rental received under a BIFR-approved rehabilitation scheme was treated as business income because the plant, machinery and other business assets remained commercial assets deployed for revival of the sick industrial unit. The arrangement was not regarded as a mere passive letting out of property; instead, the assets were temporarily exploited under a statutory reorganisation plan intended to restore business operations. The character of the receipt was therefore determined from the standpoint of a prudent businessman and the facts of each assessment year. Applying the principles governing exploitation of commercial assets, the rental was taxable as business income and not as income from other sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1213 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416447</link>
      <description>Lease rental received under a BIFR-approved rehabilitation scheme was treated as business income because the plant, machinery and other business assets remained commercial assets deployed for revival of the sick industrial unit. The arrangement was not regarded as a mere passive letting out of property; instead, the assets were temporarily exploited under a statutory reorganisation plan intended to restore business operations. The character of the receipt was therefore determined from the standpoint of a prudent businessman and the facts of each assessment year. Applying the principles governing exploitation of commercial assets, the rental was taxable as business income and not as income from other sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>