<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1208 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income under &quot;Income from House Property&quot; based on the assessee&#039;s consistent past declarations. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction of bad debts and business loss due to the cancellation of property, directing the Assessing Officer to accept these claims. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:45:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1208 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income under &quot;Income from House Property&quot; based on the assessee&#039;s consistent past declarations. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction of bad debts and business loss due to the cancellation of property, directing the Assessing Officer to accept these claims. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>