<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1207 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416441</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 33,18,94,091/- as unexplained investment in closing stock. The AO&#039;s addition was deemed unsupported by evidence, based on assumptions, and the Jilaba software data was considered unreliable for stock valuation. The CIT(A) found no defects in the audited books of accounts and emphasized that the AO cannot make additions without rejecting the books of account. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1207 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416441</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 33,18,94,091/- as unexplained investment in closing stock. The AO&#039;s addition was deemed unsupported by evidence, based on assumptions, and the Jilaba software data was considered unreliable for stock valuation. The CIT(A) found no defects in the audited books of accounts and emphasized that the AO cannot make additions without rejecting the books of account. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>