<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 46 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27551</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court retained jurisdiction over a case involving delayed petition filing and approval sought for service and know-how agreements. Despite the delay, the court proceeded with the case, emphasizing the strength of the petitioner&#039;s merits. The court directed the tax authority to consider the application for approval of the know-how agreement, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s oversight in initially seeking approval only for the service agreement. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the tax authority to review the application for the know-how agreement based on its merits, with costs to be borne by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:28:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 46 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27551</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court retained jurisdiction over a case involving delayed petition filing and approval sought for service and know-how agreements. Despite the delay, the court proceeded with the case, emphasizing the strength of the petitioner&#039;s merits. The court directed the tax authority to consider the application for approval of the know-how agreement, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s oversight in initially seeking approval only for the service agreement. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the tax authority to review the application for the know-how agreement based on its merits, with costs to be borne by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>