<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1195 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416429</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata ruled that a rectification application under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act was not maintainable if filed before a different Income-tax authority after rejection by the Assessing Officer. The proper recourse for the assessee in such cases is to appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Principal Commissioner, dismissing the appeal of the assessee and emphasizing the correct legal procedure to be followed in such instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1195 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416429</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata ruled that a rectification application under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act was not maintainable if filed before a different Income-tax authority after rejection by the Assessing Officer. The proper recourse for the assessee in such cases is to appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Principal Commissioner, dismissing the appeal of the assessee and emphasizing the correct legal procedure to be followed in such instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>