<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2069 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions related to cash payments and interest payments, emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence from the AO to support the additions based on seized materials. The Tribunal found that the seized documents were not reliable evidence and that the AO&#039;s conclusions lacked concrete evidence, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2069 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions related to cash payments and interest payments, emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence from the AO to support the additions based on seized materials. The Tribunal found that the seized documents were not reliable evidence and that the AO&#039;s conclusions lacked concrete evidence, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>