https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299779 The Tribunal affirmed that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) would continue as per the order dated 22.02.2021, emphasizing the importance of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in insolvency proceedings. The Appellant's non-payment of fees and engagement of another Advocate without proper authorization led to an adjournment for clarification on legal representation. The Appellant's Counsel's unsatisfactory conduct resulted in the matter being listed before another Bench for the Appellant's personal appearance to determine legal representation, highlighting the necessity of professionalism and decorum in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:44:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299779 The Tribunal affirmed that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) would continue as per the order dated 22.02.2021, emphasizing the importance of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in insolvency proceedings. The Appellant's non-payment of fees and engagement of another Advocate without proper authorization led to an adjournment for clarification on legal representation. The Appellant's Counsel's unsatisfactory conduct resulted in the matter being listed before another Bench for the Appellant's personal appearance to determine legal representation, highlighting the necessity of professionalism and decorum in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 03 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299779