https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299763 Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure preserves the High Court's existing inherent jurisdiction and does not create a new power. The Court ordinarily becomes functus officio after signing its criminal revision judgment, reflecting the principle of finality in criminal proceedings. However, that finality does not bar exceptional intervention where the earlier order was made without jurisdiction, involved a mandatory legal error, or rested on a misapprehension of facts. In such cases, the High Court may revoke, review, recall, alter, or rehear its earlier revisional decision only to prevent abuse of process, give effect to an order under the Code, or otherwise secure the ends of justice. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:45:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299763 Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure preserves the High Court's existing inherent jurisdiction and does not create a new power. The Court ordinarily becomes functus officio after signing its criminal revision judgment, reflecting the principle of finality in criminal proceedings. However, that finality does not bar exceptional intervention where the earlier order was made without jurisdiction, involved a mandatory legal error, or rested on a misapprehension of facts. In such cases, the High Court may revoke, review, recall, alter, or rehear its earlier revisional decision only to prevent abuse of process, give effect to an order under the Code, or otherwise secure the ends of justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299763