https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299760 Parity with co-accused justified bail where the Supreme Court had already granted bail on a holistic assessment of the case; the High Court held that the omission to expressly mention Section 409 IPC or life imprisonment could not be used to deny similar relief, and Article 141 required faithful follow-through. Bail could not be refused on speculative claims of absconding or tampering, as there was no real flight risk, the evidence was largely documentary, and the prosecution did not oppose bail on that ground. Liberal consideration of the proviso to Section 437 CrPC for a woman accused, together with the medical condition of one accused, further supported release on bail subject to conditions. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299760 Parity with co-accused justified bail where the Supreme Court had already granted bail on a holistic assessment of the case; the High Court held that the omission to expressly mention Section 409 IPC or life imprisonment could not be used to deny similar relief, and Article 141 required faithful follow-through. Bail could not be refused on speculative claims of absconding or tampering, as there was no real flight risk, the evidence was largely documentary, and the prosecution did not oppose bail on that ground. Liberal consideration of the proviso to Section 437 CrPC for a woman accused, together with the medical condition of one accused, further supported release on bail subject to conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299760