https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299759 Additional evidence in appeal is permissible only on the limited grounds in Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: refusal by the trial court of admissible evidence, inability to produce it despite due diligence, or the appellate court's need for the document to pronounce judgment or for another substantial cause. The appellate court must record reasons and cannot admit material mechanically or to fill lacunae. Here, the documents included one already on record, one unrelated to the suit property, and others arising after the trial court decree. The order permitting additional evidence was therefore unjustified and was set aside, with the appeal directed to proceed expeditiously. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Dec 2021 16:06:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299759 Additional evidence in appeal is permissible only on the limited grounds in Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: refusal by the trial court of admissible evidence, inability to produce it despite due diligence, or the appellate court's need for the document to pronounce judgment or for another substantial cause. The appellate court must record reasons and cannot admit material mechanically or to fill lacunae. Here, the documents included one already on record, one unrelated to the suit property, and others arising after the trial court decree. The order permitting additional evidence was therefore unjustified and was set aside, with the appeal directed to proceed expeditiously. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299759