https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299758 Concurrent findings that the landlords proved bona fide personal necessity were treated as findings of fact supported by the record, and the plea that the plaint was sketchy did not justify disregarding the evidence actually led. The appellants' evidence was found insufficient to displace that need, so the eviction decree was sustained. The Court also held that no proper basis existed to permit additional evidence or a remand at the second appellate stage, especially where no such request had been pursued earlier, so that request was rejected. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:54:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299758 Concurrent findings that the landlords proved bona fide personal necessity were treated as findings of fact supported by the record, and the plea that the plaint was sketchy did not justify disregarding the evidence actually led. The appellants' evidence was found insufficient to displace that need, so the eviction decree was sustained. The Court also held that no proper basis existed to permit additional evidence or a remand at the second appellate stage, especially where no such request had been pursued earlier, so that request was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299758