https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299755 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision to deny the interim injunction. It held that the letter of intent did not constitute a concluded contract, rendering the negative covenants unenforceable. The court found that the balance of convenience did not support granting the injunction, as it would cause greater harm to the respondents. The court stressed that the order's opinions were provisional and should not impact the trial court's final ruling. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:26:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299755 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision to deny the interim injunction. It held that the letter of intent did not constitute a concluded contract, rendering the negative covenants unenforceable. The court found that the balance of convenience did not support granting the injunction, as it would cause greater harm to the respondents. The court stressed that the order's opinions were provisional and should not impact the trial court's final ruling. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299755