<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299751</link>
    <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decree allowing the plaintiff to realize Rs. 2,65,000/- with interest, albeit reducing the interest rate. The court rejected the defendant&#039;s claims of stolen cheques and found the settlement deeds executed by the defendant to be fraudulent and voidable. The appeal was dismissed, and the plaintiff was entitled to execute the decree.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299751</link>
      <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decree allowing the plaintiff to realize Rs. 2,65,000/- with interest, albeit reducing the interest rate. The court rejected the defendant&#039;s claims of stolen cheques and found the settlement deeds executed by the defendant to be fraudulent and voidable. The appeal was dismissed, and the plaintiff was entitled to execute the decree.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>