<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 1010 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299750</link>
    <description>The appeal against the order of acquittal in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed by the court due to the complaint not being filed within the statutory limitation period. Despite a minor discrepancy of one or two days, the prosecution was deemed invalid as the complaint was filed beyond the prescribed deadline, leading to the court upholding the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 1010 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299750</link>
      <description>The appeal against the order of acquittal in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed by the court due to the complaint not being filed within the statutory limitation period. Despite a minor discrepancy of one or two days, the prosecution was deemed invalid as the complaint was filed beyond the prescribed deadline, leading to the court upholding the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>