<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 865 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299746</link>
    <description>Where a complaint case and a police-report case arise from the same transaction, Section 210 CrPC requires the matters to be tried together, and transfer under Section 407 may be used to avoid prejudice and conflicting findings. In this matter, the connected cases were directed to be transferred to one Magistrate court for joint trial and disposal. On anticipatory bail, although Section 438 CrPC confers concurrent jurisdiction on the High Court and Sessions Court, the settled practice is to approach the Sessions Court first unless special circumstances justify direct filing before the High Court. As no special reason was shown, the High Court declined to entertain the bail petitions at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:23:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 865 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299746</link>
      <description>Where a complaint case and a police-report case arise from the same transaction, Section 210 CrPC requires the matters to be tried together, and transfer under Section 407 may be used to avoid prejudice and conflicting findings. In this matter, the connected cases were directed to be transferred to one Magistrate court for joint trial and disposal. On anticipatory bail, although Section 438 CrPC confers concurrent jurisdiction on the High Court and Sessions Court, the settled practice is to approach the Sessions Court first unless special circumstances justify direct filing before the High Court. As no special reason was shown, the High Court declined to entertain the bail petitions at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>