<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1172 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416406</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the PCIT lacked jurisdiction to pass the impugned order as the foundational issue for invoking revisional jurisdiction was non-existent. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of confronting the assessee with any new issues before proceeding with revisional actions. The order was pronounced in the open court on 15 December 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:51:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1172 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416406</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the PCIT lacked jurisdiction to pass the impugned order as the foundational issue for invoking revisional jurisdiction was non-existent. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of confronting the assessee with any new issues before proceeding with revisional actions. The order was pronounced in the open court on 15 December 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>