https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416396 Section 4 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 was treated as raising a substantial question of law where the defendant sought to assert exclusive ownership over property standing in his mother's name. The Bombay HC held that the nature of the suit property and the legal effect of the benami plea required adjudication in second appeal, and admitted the appeal on the framed substantial questions of law. It also continued interim stay on the terms sought in the civil applications pending final hearing and disposal of the second appeal. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:51:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416396 Section 4 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 was treated as raising a substantial question of law where the defendant sought to assert exclusive ownership over property standing in his mother's name. The Bombay HC held that the nature of the suit property and the legal effect of the benami plea required adjudication in second appeal, and admitted the appeal on the framed substantial questions of law. It also continued interim stay on the terms sought in the civil applications pending final hearing and disposal of the second appeal. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416396