https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416383 The commentary explains that the twin bail conditions formerly in Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not revive after the statutory amendment, because a provision already declared unconstitutional cannot be treated as restored merely by changing the opening language without a validating law. It also notes that prolonged custody of more than eight years, completion of investigation, and non-commencement of trial justified bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as continued pre-trial detention was inconsistent with the constitutional right to speedy trial and personal liberty. Bail was therefore described as being granted on stringent conditions to secure attendance and prevent misuse of liberty. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Dec 2021 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416383 The commentary explains that the twin bail conditions formerly in Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not revive after the statutory amendment, because a provision already declared unconstitutional cannot be treated as restored merely by changing the opening language without a validating law. It also notes that prolonged custody of more than eight years, completion of investigation, and non-commencement of trial justified bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as continued pre-trial detention was inconsistent with the constitutional right to speedy trial and personal liberty. Bail was therefore described as being granted on stringent conditions to secure attendance and prevent misuse of liberty. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416383