<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine and conducted for commercial reasons, not with the intent to evade tax, in line with legal principles and precedents. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine and conducted for commercial reasons, not with the intent to evade tax, in line with legal principles and precedents. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>