<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 572 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299727</link>
    <description>A will requires strict compliance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act: while the testator may sign personally or through another person acting in his presence and by his direction, each attesting witness must himself sign or affix his mark in the testator&#039;s presence. The statute does not permit delegation of attestation, so a signature made by another person on behalf of a purported witness is insufficient. Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act then requires proof through a valid attesting witness; without such proof, the will cannot be proved in accordance with law. On that basis, the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 18:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 572 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299727</link>
      <description>A will requires strict compliance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act: while the testator may sign personally or through another person acting in his presence and by his direction, each attesting witness must himself sign or affix his mark in the testator&#039;s presence. The statute does not permit delegation of attestation, so a signature made by another person on behalf of a purported witness is insufficient. Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act then requires proof through a valid attesting witness; without such proof, the will cannot be proved in accordance with law. On that basis, the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>