<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 357 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299721</link>
    <description>The appellate court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, affirming the declaration of title over the lands in favor of the deceased respondent&#039;s successor. It found the deeds of gift and sale deed invalid due to fraud and deception, emphasizing the illiterate lady&#039;s lack of understanding. The court dismissed the appeal, reiterating the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals in property transactions and emphasizing the burden of proof on the transacting party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 357 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299721</link>
      <description>The appellate court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, affirming the declaration of title over the lands in favor of the deceased respondent&#039;s successor. It found the deeds of gift and sale deed invalid due to fraud and deception, emphasizing the illiterate lady&#039;s lack of understanding. The court dismissed the appeal, reiterating the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals in property transactions and emphasizing the burden of proof on the transacting party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>