https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416378 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court directed the respondents to de-freeze the account maintained with IndusInd Bank Ltd. The petitioner's argument that the attachment period had expired and the lack of disclosure of pending proceedings under specific sections of the GST Act rendered the impugned order not maintainable was accepted. The court emphasized that the respondents could take further legal action as necessary. The matter was disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416378 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court directed the respondents to de-freeze the account maintained with IndusInd Bank Ltd. The petitioner's argument that the attachment period had expired and the lack of disclosure of pending proceedings under specific sections of the GST Act rendered the impugned order not maintainable was accepted. The court emphasized that the respondents could take further legal action as necessary. The matter was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws GST Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416378