<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1140 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416374</link>
    <description>The court set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2012-13, as there was no rational connection between the information received from DDIT and the petitioner. The lack of nexus between the material forming the basis for reopening and the belief of income escapement led to the decision. The judgment highlighted the importance of a valid and reasoned basis for reopening assessments to maintain fairness and legality in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1140 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416374</link>
      <description>The court set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2012-13, as there was no rational connection between the information received from DDIT and the petitioner. The lack of nexus between the material forming the basis for reopening and the belief of income escapement led to the decision. The judgment highlighted the importance of a valid and reasoned basis for reopening assessments to maintain fairness and legality in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>