<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1135 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416369</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the additions made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) and the unexplained investment addition. The decision was based on the applicability of the amended provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the failure of the assessee to provide adequate explanations regarding the cash payments made for property purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1135 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416369</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the additions made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) and the unexplained investment addition. The decision was based on the applicability of the amended provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the failure of the assessee to provide adequate explanations regarding the cash payments made for property purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>