<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1132 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the order of the lower authorities and ordering the deletion of the delayed employee&#039;s contribution to provident fund. The decision was supported by the non-retrospective nature of Explanation-5 to section 43B, applicable from the Finance Act, 2021, and established judicial precedents emphasizing the retrospective application of laws in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1132 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the order of the lower authorities and ordering the deletion of the delayed employee&#039;s contribution to provident fund. The decision was supported by the non-retrospective nature of Explanation-5 to section 43B, applicable from the Finance Act, 2021, and established judicial precedents emphasizing the retrospective application of laws in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>