<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1131 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416365</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bench allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 9,36,495/- under Section 36(1)(va) for late EPF/ESIC payments. It held that contributions made before filing the return should not be disallowed and that amendments by the Finance Act, 2021, were prospective. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of following binding precedents and set aside the order passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, deeming it unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1131 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416365</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bench allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 9,36,495/- under Section 36(1)(va) for late EPF/ESIC payments. It held that contributions made before filing the return should not be disallowed and that amendments by the Finance Act, 2021, were prospective. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of following binding precedents and set aside the order passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, deeming it unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>