https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416350 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act may rest on Section 108 Customs statements and corroborative surrounding material, because subjective satisfaction is not governed by the ordinary rules of criminal evidence; the detention orders were upheld on that basis. Non-supply of CCTV footage did not vitiate detention where it was not a relied-upon document, and no material misstatement was found in the detention record. Custody of the detenues did not bar detention when the authority was aware of that custody and the likelihood of bail. The Advisory Board was held to have discharged its statutory function, with no denial of opportunity or constitutional infirmity established. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 Dec 2021 09:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416350 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act may rest on Section 108 Customs statements and corroborative surrounding material, because subjective satisfaction is not governed by the ordinary rules of criminal evidence; the detention orders were upheld on that basis. Non-supply of CCTV footage did not vitiate detention where it was not a relied-upon document, and no material misstatement was found in the detention record. Custody of the detenues did not bar detention when the authority was aware of that custody and the likelihood of bail. The Advisory Board was held to have discharged its statutory function, with no denial of opportunity or constitutional infirmity established. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416350