https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416343 In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, anticipatory bail was refused because the special bail restrictions under section 45 were treated as mandatory and overriding the general provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court considered the seriousness of economic offences, the nature of money-laundering allegations, and the requirement that the twin statutory conditions be satisfied before bail could be granted. As those conditions were not met, no ground was made out for pre-arrest bail and the request was declined on merits. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416343 In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, anticipatory bail was refused because the special bail restrictions under section 45 were treated as mandatory and overriding the general provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court considered the seriousness of economic offences, the nature of money-laundering allegations, and the requirement that the twin statutory conditions be satisfied before bail could be granted. As those conditions were not met, no ground was made out for pre-arrest bail and the request was declined on merits. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416343