<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1107 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416341</link>
    <description>At the discharge and charge-framing stage, the court must only see whether the prosecution record discloses sufficient ground to proceed, without conducting a roving enquiry or weighing defence material. Interference in revision lies only where the order shows illegality, perversity, or material irregularity, and no such jurisdictional error was found. On the materials collected, the petitioner&#039;s role as director, the transfer of PAN matters to the public servant co-accused, and the surrounding circumstances were treated as capable of supporting an inference of criminal conspiracy and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. A private person may be proceeded against with a public servant where the material discloses a coordinated corrupt design.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1107 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416341</link>
      <description>At the discharge and charge-framing stage, the court must only see whether the prosecution record discloses sufficient ground to proceed, without conducting a roving enquiry or weighing defence material. Interference in revision lies only where the order shows illegality, perversity, or material irregularity, and no such jurisdictional error was found. On the materials collected, the petitioner&#039;s role as director, the transfer of PAN matters to the public servant co-accused, and the surrounding circumstances were treated as capable of supporting an inference of criminal conspiracy and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. A private person may be proceeded against with a public servant where the material discloses a coordinated corrupt design.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=416341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>