<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27527</link>
    <description>The court held that the audit report constituted valid information for reopening the assessment under section 17(1)(b) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The report identified discrepancies in the treatment of assets and liabilities by the assessee, supporting the reassessment. The court emphasized that the audit report&#039;s role was to highlight factual inaccuracies, not dictate legal conclusions. Consequently, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the petition challenging the reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27527</link>
      <description>The court held that the audit report constituted valid information for reopening the assessment under section 17(1)(b) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The report identified discrepancies in the treatment of assets and liabilities by the assessee, supporting the reassessment. The court emphasized that the audit report&#039;s role was to highlight factual inaccuracies, not dictate legal conclusions. Consequently, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the petition challenging the reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>