https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299716 At the discharge stage under Section 227 CrPC, the court must assess only the prosecution material at face value and not the accused's defence version. If that material creates grave suspicion or a prima facie basis for involvement, discharge is not warranted merely because an alternative explanation is possible. Applying that standard, file notings, the request for legal opinion, the Deputy Director (Legal)'s statement, and the order for mineral dispatch permits together supported the prosecution allegation of improper action under Rule 37, so the challenge to refusal of discharge failed. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 Dec 2021 09:28:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299716 At the discharge stage under Section 227 CrPC, the court must assess only the prosecution material at face value and not the accused's defence version. If that material creates grave suspicion or a prima facie basis for involvement, discharge is not warranted merely because an alternative explanation is possible. Applying that standard, file notings, the request for legal opinion, the Deputy Director (Legal)'s statement, and the order for mineral dispatch permits together supported the prosecution allegation of improper action under Rule 37, so the challenge to refusal of discharge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299716